(20) How vospryanuv from sleep, my lord,
waking otmahneshsya of their image.
In continuation with this explanation strangely blurred revelation - it's time seems to share the reasons for the very blurring. It may not be different because it is on the verge sleep, and generally life is a dream . Novo, is not it? Whose dream, that is the question. And the answer is: by all stakeholders.
Sleeping God. That he, in fact, quite often does in Scripture, causing impatient prayers with a request to wake up. And that means - not just from the ceiling took that blasphemous question: Is there have knowledge of God? In this story, all right, and all the words are confirmed, though from an unexpected and daunting as amended.
Son is not equal to lack, and he just complicates the logic of presence. Without going into the metaphysical implications of this simple remark, start with the fact that the bye with a hope for full and final event, will inevitably tread down to the smallest features, gazing wide-eyed, obviously penetrating in themselves and others. This only - in the afternoon, with fire ...
Can we call evildoers nightmare of God? And the obsessive, from which - while you sleep - not so easy dismiss? [1] We, in general, not too far removed from God, each other, mesmerized and trembling? With God that way, I keep award names hinting at the distance, a respectful distance: my Lord . On the one hand, the connection is lost, and readily recognized ( my ), on the other hand ... Only because of my prophecy, dreams allowed for revival, which interchange dream and reality. By chain reaction: waking up God will dispel the nightmare, the former merely wrong side of another dream about "peace" villains ( rest us can only dream , as we know). And this one moment ( instantly , Article 19) will shrink infinity. [2] But it has not yet arrived. Otherwise, why would all of the above line up such a conclusion here:
(21) For my heart TURNED,
and inside pierced through and through.
Apparently, it is proposed stock of the situation, formed after the mysterious revelation. First, the window remains the same. [3] Prophetic reversing out "their" world, only gave a new form of my pain, extending it, moving far beyond the usual discontent "the human condition." Heart, caught up in the center of a very complex design, so long marveled at its "purity" of that - how would I say? - Yes, completely TURNED. Filled with acid, it became sour taste ( yitkhametz levavi ). We are not talking about the psychological "fullness bitterly." No, our "heart of peace" TURNED - like the wine into vinegar, spoiled, curdle, and nothing else will not do. Does not produce, such as "thought" (let me reiterate that the "heart" to the ancients - the same as the "mind" at recently). A inside in this case - does not respond to feelings (literally - "kidneys", focused feelings). Waking up in the middle of the prophecy, letting in a "them" shattered world, I found myself at a live target position, where all the arrows. barely alive, in truth, because they have passed through , but whether live in such sitoobraznom form?
(22) I - stupidly, without any knowledge ...
describes the symptoms that finally emerged from the failure of the heart, I can hardly bring together him with the infamous "broken." Then ( lev nishbar ) still has always been more or less connected with the context of repentance. Here, despite the recognition in stupidity ( vaar ) , without the knowledge of , no apology does not bring. Not be better to hear this phrase with a share estestvoispytatelskogo credibility to the fact [4] , as evidence of the clinical developments? Reaching a certain level of pain, judging ryadyaschee heart-sodden, and quite dramatically, - As a man can be, and not given to easy-human life. Draw a pain, embodied with my reluctant help, - withdrew from circulation all available in walking thoughts and exchange them for hard currency ignorance. [5]
(22) I - stupidly, without any knowledge,
Scott am with you.
not said " as animal", and - animals . And even - or to be entirely accurate - Animals mi "( behemot ), in the plural. This is probably the stresses a collective sense: that same animal, vymechtannaya loss of human appearance [6] , - from the subject of envy has become a generic classification. Wild or domestic animal? wild animal I was with you ... No, for the wild often added behemot - sade . So - home already tamed. In cats and dogs - A bad reputation in our time, so it's best to stay on something useful on the farm: a bull, a donkey.
Does this mean that my relationship with God was not interrupted namely the "bestial" level? Certainly, but - again - to start with the refinements. This relationship awake animal next to a sleeping owner ( as vospryanuv from sleep, my lord ), responsible for his dream in a sense. Pure metaphysical presence - as a blunt tail obmahivanie seriously ill cattle. It's hard not to recognize that it is in this way add up the latest information about getting into "the sanctuary" revelation.
[1] Tivze : "otmahneshsya, put in anything at all" - rather than "otneseshsya with contempt." How said about Esau ( Gen. 25:34) - pace M. Dahood.
[2] interesting that according to Rashi, the villains are of " endless sleep, sleep infinity ( Kitz в ст.20 сближается с ketz ).
[3] E. Beaucamp, The Psalter, Ps 73-150, Paris, Gabalda, P. 8: " The bitterness of heart and kidney irritation spoken verse 21 does not refer, we believe, the temptation passed, they are still present ... a misfortune "
[4] Did not Platonov about "scientific signs of hunger?
[5] Many recognize, of course, how Nachman of Breslov describes the transition from one spiritual level to another, from knowledge to ignorance. See . chapter Faith, Doubt and Reason in book A. Green, Tormented Master , Woodstock, Vermont, Jewish Lights, 1992.
[6] Isaiah 52:14: " and species had no human ".
(18) Yes ..
Every time he heard it Yes ( akh ) does not prevent the guard. It was the third, and with his very first phenomena (art. 1) is expressed as a hasty affirmation that all further, is to be expected, could only justify the suspicion of a trick. [1] always so: only confident about anything to declare, as immediately begin this doubt. Checked.
Yes, you threw them in Obryvische,
threw in Obvalische!
(19) Really? Instantly - in Krushilische,
finished, perished in ghosts?
Here's what stood out in the picture unclear revelation "sanctuaries" for nerve flares poluvyvernutoy new bulbs Yes , filled to overflowing doubt. It is noteworthy that the memory of Moses and the whole (Nor, for that matter) is prophetic line, it seems, or never publicized. In contrast to the soothsayers, the prophets do not predict the future, and speak on his behalf. Through them, the future is in talks with the present. Therefore, their words exactly as is calculated to exercise as that is not true. What remained - interferes with, literally, not in the business, not in his time. Who saw him forced to behave as if that, perhaps, never come, - has already arrived. As if time was neproglazhennym dress, and the prophets were nesting in its folds.
shadow encased in each crease is given the name, and carries it with some even calling as part of a whole vocabulary of silent and irrevocable damage. Animate outputs nothing dig Truncations ("slippery") and pull down the rock falls. [2] Verbs also hint at already established the silence, doubling the shade and inviting to look at the decline in terms of its completion, the new "Serenity". [3] All that was put in Ras-ablative, only suitable for the removal of the death mask in the world.
Pressure macabre details were should we stop bending all the same "prophetic" line, erupting in my voice from the other side: the mask is removed in accordance with published genre - a complaint, lamentation [4] (all those exclamation points and question marks, the implied interleaving yes Yes, indeed! - with How? [5] Is in fact, all burned .. .). "Prophecy" also manifests itself in a strange variety of the genre to which I was, by all indications, irresistibly drawn: that the prophets most readily undertaken a mocking laments ( How art thou fallen from heaven! - Isaiah 14:12; Jer 9:18 ...). Or even more accurately will say that in my mourning, with all its pathetic pobulkivaet and laughter. In this case, does not abolish the complaint. It may be that only gets the right to withdraw on the surface, break the sound barrier - a grotesque.
Those who are watching me from the beginning, it was not surprised. Detailed description of my envy also could be taken for satire. And now it seems to have transformed. Because there is no indication that I'm happy about my discovery of "their" fall. Entrancement extends only to a new, second vision of evil. In the end, envy and jealousy, jealousy and love ... Do not be the last hope then just collapsed?
should be recalled that the object of my envy of the world was not "the success of the villains (and thus the text is different from so many other" teoditseynyh " [6] ). I never called for their punishment, and he was indifferent to any security measures. Made me change is not a new situation in which the world of villains already would somehow disturbed. Feel they opened me a concussion, and the word "villain" to them would not be applicable. The absence of peace, humanity disease and the ability to Revelation - are inseparable, and the whole drama of understanding of the impending collapse occurs only in my heart. Located (as stated) inside filled heaven and earth villains; far inside (as it turned out): surrounded by the first "his people" and collectively, the "them", whose collapse in the real time and described. Wicked, evil in its pure form - only the shell, peel, the last ring of Saturn's melancholy. Their world - the quintessence of pain that no one does not test. The closer to me, to the mysterious "here", the greater the chance of experiencing drama collapse, enduring punishment - instead of "them", apparently. I may be, and there is a place where nobody's pain is someone else. Lacked their pain to be a man, so - serve more out-of-human.
As a result, - This satirical lament. Responsible, with the daunting symmetry, the first words spoken quite my voice (v. 2):
little b - my legs buckled,
nothing would - my steps spilled.
obtained since the revelation may be affected only to the transfiguration of separating from the fall "nothing".
(To be continued)
[1] About suspicion this " yes " very well said J. Magonet: " Its very assertiveness implies the doubts that lie behind it " ( A Rabbi reads the Psalms , London, SCM Press, 2004, p. 61).
[2] last word I did not have the heart to translate as "catastrophe", but it itself - cognate with "Shoah."
Regarding capitalization. I think the correct guess M . Dahood 'and the fact that the four symbols of the fallen state of art. 18-19 must belong to almost own the name of another, the lower world (as Sheol, for example). It includes such names about thirty in the Bible. Persuasive argument for me was the name of God, "King of Dire places" ("monsters") in the Job 18:4. Rashi also believes that these balahot - demons.
[3] embedding it on the ruins of a train of cranes in the Scriptures: Isaiah 24:12, Job 38:27, etc .
[4] Kraus: This part of the psalm - funeral song .
[5] last even opens the so-called "Lamentations".
[6] In order to ensure a change of intonation is best to compare with the numerous literal roll of the book of Job: fat villains (15:25-27), their serene atheism (gl.21), their dream-like impermanence (gl.20). But neither Job nor Elifaz do not envy the wicked, and do not grieve for them later.
All the following will give away the basis of this omission, the most verbose explanations only serve the establishment of form of the unknown, separating it from the other unknowns. It must be noted that every word in just spoken sentences (Article 17) razfokusirovalos, leaving just a blur - as if kinotsenzura walked around too loosely scene: " God ", " sanctuary ", " them ", " left "...
selected here since the name of God, is the third of the met (after Elohim , Elyon - "God," "Almighty"), which can not surprise deliberate triviality. Just at that moment when we got to - if not the description, it mentions - some kind of revelation - suddenly nearer God designated just as El , that is almost "whatever god". The name by which God was known to whom he was not even known, well at least Hananeyanam. Such name - already half of anonymity, the willingness to respond to first-encountered.
The venue change was also possible: there is no indication at the Temple in Jerusalem. Unintelligible sanctuary - plural - ignores all the painstaking process of centralization (which resulted in the speaker "Land of Israel," says "The Temple", and saying "Temple" - "Holy of Holies). Some even thought that there generally are not talking about any specific "Cult" circumstances, places, and they offered to understand sanctuary of God as sacred mysteries [1] . But even without taking her to the allegory and metaphors, we must acknowledge that the solid frame votserkovlyayuschaya clouded and razlezlas. Maybe I walked a lot of temples. Can be attacked on the trail one of the temporary camps, as in the desert. Or came to a memorial stone, which liked to leave behind the patriarchs. Who knows.
Not in the least clearly this is the case with the content of revelation. It is obvious that it is associated with "them." It would, however ill-advised "them" identified solely with the "villains" slightly narrower and almost forgotten. Also - why hide it? - More than the word "wicked", I will not eat, and not by accident. [2] In the current situation, "they" are viewed only by extension: through my voice, which almost spoke as my generation, but it - about the plot in treacherously. As in the case of the "sanctuary", the index finger produces some kind of circular motion, not stopping at a well-defined facility, but nothing is excluded.
Finally, the last uncertainty surrounds itself predict events. What remained. Akharit - amazing word. It refers to the residue left over in the end, then on the last segment. But this is not the end. As James tells his sons what should happen In the remaining days ", be - akharit ha - yamim (Gen. 49:1). Although it is possible to understand the same expression as what's left after "them" . Or in another way: did not say et - akharitam (just "what they left), and l e - akharitam , with a strange excuse. I would like for it to grasp, as for the most interesting hint that enables hear the phrase as: I realized what was left of "them" - to understand . If "they" include and villains (which would of course), then their "eternal serenity" would have been yet certainly not in terms of temporal extension, and opening the new level of meaning the opposite direction is already known.
at untangling all the uncertainties surrounding the receiving revelation, certainly leaves a lot of time. Start as it is best thought of the closest parallels to, but not elsewhere, as in the song of Moses, Hearken! (Deuteronomy, Chapter 32). So close that can not exclude a direct quote: Whether they are wise, you would have comprehended it, would understand what they left ( le - akharitam : Deut. 32:29). [3] My position once again finds his rhymes in Moses. Warning, either run over all available ferocity of that "them" in store for 'later', and by this warning canceling the inevitability of such developments. It would be a pity not to try this option.
(To be continued)
[1] This tradition is most persistently defended by M. Buber.
[2] For me it is - one of the key arguments Against such a habitual reading in the sense of "punishment of villains."
[3] All agree that this psalm was written after the return from exile. Of course, by the time the text of Deuteronomy was completely finished, but there are poetic compositions - known long before that.
(16) In this knowledge to get the idea -
was hard to my eyes ...
Following the epidemic infestation returns The second part of the definition: work, pain-labor ( amal ) Adam's Curse, "by the sweat of my eyes." Unconditional news and unexpected developments have recognize the recognized tautology: the labor that marked the path of man - is, first of all, in thinking about this very way.
"Knowledge" to the ancients, of course - not information, and awareness, and science - a tradition ispytyvaniya some experience and skill to the story about him. I would strongly closer together thinking and knowledge with what has been said about the heart. Just time for a more detailed description. In that same "carved pattern," the erased at villains (V. 7) - in indelible graffiti, densely covered with in-line system of my heart - contains everything you need. I do not aspire to knowledge, and from there to start. It always stood there that look for him? We are talking about science, growing up in reverse order: tree roots up, with each gust of wind rustling automatically Believe your pain .
But to think about already famous go all the forces. How to breathe on frosted "knowledge" to a little thawed? Opened thoughts, expectant for the right moment? And what must have eyes, so that they could be called a body of thought , entrusted with the task penetrate into the "knowledge" as soon as it ceases to resist?
Maybe not too long to wait. Can not be left unnoticed by the appearance of clarifying "it": in the knowledge that ... I think it is a little nearer, and relates - among other things - to have just said in the previous sentence. In other words, once I gave myself thought to penetrate into the knowledge of how to remain faithful to the wrong "generation of sons." And, it turns out, it was necessary ask this question in a suitable place to knowledge suddenly revealed.
And then - should be read in one breath:
was difficult my eyes ...
(17) before he came to the sanctuary of God,
and what is left of them - understand.
What happened? I will not say. Not now not immediately ...
(To be continued)
can only assume one thing: rather than mutual attraction is kept empty and clean? That is try to read vain, clean as explaining recurrence. My efforts were in vain, and so clean? It seems that in this world deserve remind the main features of humanity, man:
(14) I was amazed at all the day,
and bruised every morning.
clock Employment disease, all day ; being updated through the morning's update of pain. Now these lesions, and pain in detail to sign before [1] go in a different capacity - politely but firmly, contradicting a long tradition, reduces the situation to a rather simple alignment: the righteous surprise of suffering in spite of perfection. So it was possible to Job. The oldest Midrash tehilim understood: " what way - good? Do not read "those who a pure heart, and - for those whose hearts are purified ".
If anything, something "sacrificial" in such purity remains. But the gesture of separation untouchable (preferably the best - I was flattered to) the parts confused what were the fact:
(15) If I said: "Conspiracy as they" -
your sons generation b betrayed.
We are at one position, but we can not say the same thing? generation of your sons - this generation is living the sons of Israel. [2] And they've just said is ... Their faith swayed, and on some scales hand crept into the prosecution and guilt. It is the duty of solidarity could only consist in poddakivanii. We can not deny that my voice is almost merged with the question: Yes there is knowledge of God? But something prevented the full merger. Interestingly, the desire to dissociate itself is not justified by such an obvious failure to question God, but - demanding greater solidarity is with those who doubt it: I would their betrayed if they speak!
"Net", "sacrifice" is often another following to the end they wish to identify himself with the masses. In this controversy need to maintain loyalty lies some secret supplies - and, perhaps, the only noteworthy form of affiliation.
bundle of votes followed by another shift, barely noticeable, in a random clause: your sons ... not yet begun (and perhaps never will) prayer in a literal sense, but it appeared "you", which I suddenly decided to overlook. All turned away, and then agreed to look for a second. Question But how he should know God? , avoiding any appeal, not that this is cleared, but as if transferred by address. I remind you - "you" - that they are your sons. How, indeed, Moses reminded them standing on the hill, in response to the divine otkreschivaniya and offer private deal: "This is - your people" (Exodus 32:10-11). For any other response, he would their betrayed, not God.
(To be continued)
[1] same parallelism "defeat" and "flour" - in 2 Samuel 7:14.
[2] cm . A . Chacham , ad. loc. M . Dahood , based on Ugaritic roots, offering to read: " meeting the children of Israel." It is a pity that our psalm is not written in Ugaritic.
Kimhi once found an original solution: "If I speak like this generation - it would have been a traitor." But this, of course, oversimplifies the problem.
Here we have to endure a long pause.
Again Yes ...
whom I did it all mean? If "no knowledge of Almighty," it certainly is not him. Probably, I just keep respond to the first voice heard (Article 1), so cheerfully broadcasting of goodness and purity. This is repeated Yes ... would be summarizing the expression of an official his distrust. If we had not existed in a completely different dimensions. It is one thing - loud, in the whole area, maxims, and the other - the recognition of single, full hyperbole (" Jews naive and exaggerated ", Rozanov wrote shortly before his death).
(13) Yes, in vain ...
wait for the and blurted out a key on the table: vain ... ( rik , "nothing-inside"). So try the first notes of entering new tunes before playing it in full:
Yes, I am wasting our hearts clean,
hands bathed in purity.
clean vessel, and nothing was poured. Prepare dinner, and guests are not come. Clean, is not self-sufficient, and there are only the rights of expectations obessmyslivayas when the tank is not filled. What do I expect? That "God will be knowledge "(v. 11). Waiting for this seems to be fully grasped, and led to clean just unbelievable: the eye absorbs the heart is considering and deciding allows specify hand, that leads to performance - flawless, with no blots. [1] And in vain.
To call this prayer, we need to have good will on the brink of insanity. In extreme cases, could be adjusted to her to pray because of regret, vain ... , but the entire catch is I'm sorry not to be something, but in compliance commandments of God. Did not ask anyone should boast.
As it is still compatible with the urgent assurances clean? And whether a well confuse the additional question: Can there be a clean heart, is influenced by a horse dose of envy? So take a deep draw into himself expressed "his people" questioned the degree of competence of the divine?
But the use of my tendency to think reflect, to notice, to pick the color and shape, lay on the bags, glued on top of the label. All that is expected from a wise man (or apprentice sage, add so as not to scare people). Russian translation can not keep up with my entomological meticulousness and pick up to each of the three encountered here the notation of purity: bar , zakh , naki [2] (transparent, crystal?).
What understanding of purity can be extracted from this namely, the text? Let's just say the two most common presentation in this case fail [3] :
1) purity of as a separate, cut off from the general part, "dedicated to" sacrifice. Nothing so far not indicated the uniqueness of my case.
2) Clean as intact originally stored completeness. If someone really fits this idea, because it is - as mentioned - the villains.
(To be continued)
[1] Ibn Ezra stressed that the purity of arms - refers to actions, actions.
[2] important fact: in this heap of various approaches to clean, no ritual purity ( tahor , another synonym).
[3] enough to mention the anthropological of Mary Douglas.
