can only assume one thing: rather than mutual attraction is kept empty and clean? That is try to read vain, clean as explaining recurrence. My efforts were in vain, and so clean? It seems that in this world deserve remind the main features of humanity, man:
(14) I was amazed at all the day,
and bruised every morning.
clock Employment disease, all day ; being updated through the morning's update of pain. Now these lesions, and pain in detail to sign before [1] go in a different capacity - politely but firmly, contradicting a long tradition, reduces the situation to a rather simple alignment: the righteous surprise of suffering in spite of perfection. So it was possible to Job. The oldest Midrash tehilim understood: " what way - good? Do not read "those who a pure heart, and - for those whose hearts are purified ".
If anything, something "sacrificial" in such purity remains. But the gesture of separation untouchable (preferably the best - I was flattered to) the parts confused what were the fact:
(15) If I said: "Conspiracy as they" -
your sons generation b betrayed.
We are at one position, but we can not say the same thing? generation of your sons - this generation is living the sons of Israel. [2] And they've just said is ... Their faith swayed, and on some scales hand crept into the prosecution and guilt. It is the duty of solidarity could only consist in poddakivanii. We can not deny that my voice is almost merged with the question: Yes there is knowledge of God? But something prevented the full merger. Interestingly, the desire to dissociate itself is not justified by such an obvious failure to question God, but - demanding greater solidarity is with those who doubt it: I would their betrayed if they speak!
"Net", "sacrifice" is often another following to the end they wish to identify himself with the masses. In this controversy need to maintain loyalty lies some secret supplies - and, perhaps, the only noteworthy form of affiliation.
bundle of votes followed by another shift, barely noticeable, in a random clause: your sons ... not yet begun (and perhaps never will) prayer in a literal sense, but it appeared "you", which I suddenly decided to overlook. All turned away, and then agreed to look for a second. Question But how he should know God? , avoiding any appeal, not that this is cleared, but as if transferred by address. I remind you - "you" - that they are your sons. How, indeed, Moses reminded them standing on the hill, in response to the divine otkreschivaniya and offer private deal: "This is - your people" (Exodus 32:10-11). For any other response, he would their betrayed, not God.
(To be continued)
[1] same parallelism "defeat" and "flour" - in 2 Samuel 7:14.
[2] cm . A . Chacham , ad. loc. M . Dahood , based on Ugaritic roots, offering to read: " meeting the children of Israel." It is a pity that our psalm is not written in Ugaritic.
Kimhi once found an original solution: "If I speak like this generation - it would have been a traitor." But this, of course, oversimplifies the problem.
0 comments:
Post a Comment