Here we have to endure a long pause.
Again Yes ...
whom I did it all mean? If "no knowledge of Almighty," it certainly is not him. Probably, I just keep respond to the first voice heard (Article 1), so cheerfully broadcasting of goodness and purity. This is repeated Yes ... would be summarizing the expression of an official his distrust. If we had not existed in a completely different dimensions. It is one thing - loud, in the whole area, maxims, and the other - the recognition of single, full hyperbole (" Jews naive and exaggerated ", Rozanov wrote shortly before his death).
(13) Yes, in vain ...
wait for the and blurted out a key on the table: vain ... ( rik , "nothing-inside"). So try the first notes of entering new tunes before playing it in full:
Yes, I am wasting our hearts clean,
hands bathed in purity.
clean vessel, and nothing was poured. Prepare dinner, and guests are not come. Clean, is not self-sufficient, and there are only the rights of expectations obessmyslivayas when the tank is not filled. What do I expect? That "God will be knowledge "(v. 11). Waiting for this seems to be fully grasped, and led to clean just unbelievable: the eye absorbs the heart is considering and deciding allows specify hand, that leads to performance - flawless, with no blots. [1] And in vain.
To call this prayer, we need to have good will on the brink of insanity. In extreme cases, could be adjusted to her to pray because of regret, vain ... , but the entire catch is I'm sorry not to be something, but in compliance commandments of God. Did not ask anyone should boast.
As it is still compatible with the urgent assurances clean? And whether a well confuse the additional question: Can there be a clean heart, is influenced by a horse dose of envy? So take a deep draw into himself expressed "his people" questioned the degree of competence of the divine?
But the use of my tendency to think reflect, to notice, to pick the color and shape, lay on the bags, glued on top of the label. All that is expected from a wise man (or apprentice sage, add so as not to scare people). Russian translation can not keep up with my entomological meticulousness and pick up to each of the three encountered here the notation of purity: bar , zakh , naki [2] (transparent, crystal?).
What understanding of purity can be extracted from this namely, the text? Let's just say the two most common presentation in this case fail [3] :
1) purity of as a separate, cut off from the general part, "dedicated to" sacrifice. Nothing so far not indicated the uniqueness of my case.
2) Clean as intact originally stored completeness. If someone really fits this idea, because it is - as mentioned - the villains.
(To be continued)
[1] Ibn Ezra stressed that the purity of arms - refers to actions, actions.
[2] important fact: in this heap of various approaches to clean, no ritual purity ( tahor , another synonym).
[3] enough to mention the anthropological of Mary Douglas.
0 comments:
Post a Comment