As we know, there are some kinds of fish, prepared with requires only one thing: careful identification of taste the fish, with a barely noticeable support, where the main thing - do not scare all the subtle, but they bring. But we know this is not for everyone. Once had to buy a trout on the packaging of which - as usual - offered recipes for the ignorant. And I was amazed that All three prescription were acts of vandalism of varying severity. Then we were advised to put out a trout in tomato sauce, then fight off her natural taste turmeric, the spread-eagle on the grill ... While trout is necessary or just gently dip into barely boiling podlimonenny broth, and in it rather than scald cook, or roll in chopped almonds and lightly toast, or wrap in spinach leaves and soak for a couple, and if very large - very quick bake in the oven with a good white wine, not a sharp taste, which then mix with a little heavy cream and serve overlaid with asparagus ...
A similar feeling arises when reading some exegetical literature. As if the authors have given myself to score a taste of Scripture (and especially the New Testament) by all available means: pereperchit neither here nor there is not going Greek parallels from Sophocles to Plutarch, mince ancient rhetoric, boil in structuralism ... No matter how our lives had become easier if all of the bibliographies povykidyvat "trout in tomato sauce, how much free time!
0 comments:
Post a Comment