Because ...
No analysis is far from over, too long ago I was their watch ... Need to make a new conclusion, ask additional questions. However, this particular conclusion is not quite hear (it should be, at this point, I again Steel legs are folded). It can transmit about [1] :
it because here he returned to his people,
and spilled for their high water?
Obviously, everything said so far is crowned by a comparison with the original voices are heard, so confidently asserted goodness of God to Israel. But something happened to my tongue, suddenly switched to the euphemisms. I mumble that nevnyatitsu himself, not daring to name just is no God or Israel, confining vague "he", "our people" ... We must assume that came guess I caught unawares. Anthropology, replaced cosmology gives way to theology. The villains are not only filled the whole earth, and - in particular, and what particular! - Promised Land of Israel. And not just the sky, and - The sky over this Land.
How often remember an old rabbinic principle of " We would never have dared to say if that was not written ". Voltaire (not next to whether people will remember) once spoke: " land flowing with milk and honey"! My poor Jews, you are deceived. "We must acknowledge that there is no can not be any of the tricky questions that would Scripture to itself is not specified.
So the question is: for Mademoiselle must develop a skull ... For what, in fact, God has led Israel into the land, if things there situation according to my description? What is his kindness? And what a "clean heart" it meet? Returned - the same constant verb, which relied so God and the prophets of pressing forward, repeating almost every page: return, to him to turn. Well, it came out, so what? Shed - say! - Promised blessing, "Break" [2] in the dry land "full of water, "Waters of abundance" [3] . And then what else?
Here keyword, of course, here ( halom ), to return the nation - infrequent, ambiguous, involved as a fig leaf. Third, unpronounceable, Skin unstick after God and Israel: The Land. "Here" - one of the most mysterious words language, proposing to follow some kind of index finger, but not having any sense out of this gesture. Less than a word or even a name. "Wherever I am." Dancing on the stove, which calls upon the "me", which can be, and she just - a side effect of the localization of a "here". All my descriptions flocked to a puddle, a representation of a certain place that I occupy, regardless of the sky, beyond the earth, inside of which by definition is just "outside" ... And now it turns out it - "here" - rusty scratch, the rest of the theologically sung salvation and blessings.
(To be continued)
[1] far the most enigmatic verse in this psalm. Briggs in his time he threw at all as an unnecessary insertion. Does not even make sense to list all the proposed transfers. My reading comes from a desire not to correct masoretsky text and try to squeeze out of the fact that there is some connection (even though I admit witty Kraus proposed amendment to umileyhem yamotzu , "spilled their word, trust Kraus wet slightly by the fact that he was somehow is too often resorted to the amendment of the text ...). Tempting and the hypothesis (referred to A. Chacham), under which all this verse speaks on behalf of villains but it stops me is that it starts with a clear copyright "Because ...".
[2] Reading yimatzu as a "strait", "Break" - In accordance with Lev 1:15.
[3] It takes M . Tate , and is probably right.
0 comments:
Post a Comment